阿欣與堅坑大大都解釋得很對.而我只是想要知道:1. 為神海倫王認為saying是當另一個主詞?> 是因為看到動名詞，所以沒想清楚就認為它是當另一個主詞Orzsaying後面有受詞(名詞子句)所以也不會是動名詞.2. 海倫王認為這句話的意思是什麼(中語翻譯)?> 這句中文，我的翻譯是:那名男士控告他曾任職的公司違法解僱他。所以你認為saying在這裡是神摸意思呢?

The man sued the Co.----s+vsaying that they had dismissed him illegally=(HK UA cinema dismissed Him1985 illegally told and said by TVB Co HK.) is noun clause with verbal noun 'saying' as a gerund-----othat he had [email protected] is an adj.cl---not two subjects to 'man'

不對：saying是連接the man sued控告的內容，主句：其實可以從報導角度寫The man sued XXX company saying that ....但要注明XXX company是這人的受僱公司，所以(which...)是加插先指明這公司跟這人的關係：'which he has worked at'這子句是附加形容。因此這子句不能接另一主句，因為主句是他'提出控告'這的行動

The man sued the company [(which/that) he had worked at] saying that they had dismissed him illegally.  [關係子句] 是修飾 'company'，以下例句不再重複。首先你要明白'sue'(控告)這動詞，其後面一般會配搭一個原因或理由。可以用下列四種句法去表達:1. 介詞 'for'    The man sued the company for illegal dismissal.2. 連接詞 'because'    The man sued the company because they had dismissed him illegally.3. 分詞構句 (副詞片語 ~ adverb phrase for reason):    The man sued the company having been dismissed illegally.或 Having been dismissed illegally, the man sued the company.4. 將原因陳述(用say, claim, allege等動詞)，然後變成分詞片語:    The man sued the company alleging that they had dismissed him illegally. 結論: 也就是說, 'saying'是分詞，而不是當此句的另一個主詞(動名詞當主詞)!**回應你的問題....省略的關代應該是'that'?My mistake, 其實關代which和that也可用於帶介词的defining子句上, 致歉!