已解答這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
7個答案 這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
-
匿名 #1樓
( )you at home, you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?若抄文句沒錯/漏的話,( ) you at home中沒有動詞,從文意(意思)來看,若填入A. Were you at home是一條問題句,因此句子應該是Were you at home? 但現在句是前後兩截的,看來應該是一組條件conditional句。B. If you at home, you could open the door for me.但這樣的子句'If you at home'是口語的片語,若是原整的文法應該是If you are at home, you could open the door for me.才是正確的'假設性'條件句子。C. Would you at home, ...這問句前段結構跟後段不成立。意思上Would是問'可否?'D. Should you at home,...。意思上Should是問'應否?'或這寫法亦可以是假設性'若然你....',但我認為文法上仍欠'動詞'。句式上唯有寫/說Should you be at home, you could open the door for me.才是正確的英文句法說出一樣沒有發生過的假設情景回想。因此四個答案都沒有'正確';若然必要在錯選擇中選一個較為'合情理和文理'而意思上較接近這段說話的情況:「我不知你是否在家,假如現在你在家,我希望你能給我開門;但現在我知道了你在公司(工作中),我便不打擾你了。」,我唯有選B. 只是因為較為'直接'的假設用詞(不理會文法錯誤)說出我假設性的原想法,只表示意會這段說話的前後含意。若然翻查原文,看看是否抄漏了些字:( ) you're at home, ...
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #2樓
The conditional adj is depending on a certain conditioneg:-His agreement to open the door is due to the fact that if he is at home, and not at work.Hence (A) Were you at home.The other variety from which to choose=choice are not conditional.
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #3樓
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #4樓
A:if
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #5樓
If you at home, you could open the doors for me. But since you are at work and I don't want to bother you.
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #6樓
A 是對的.Were you at home... = If you were at home ...是<與事實相反的假設語氣>
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #7樓
本句為標準假設句且與現在事實相反,為何不能用if 因為欠缺動詞,所以本句還原為?if you were at home,you could open the door for me.另可改成動詞提前。were you at home,you could open the door for me.亦可
回答日期:2021-04-19
其他問題
- 希洽- 我英文化祭的歌怎麼一億播放的? 我英文化祭的歌怎麼一億播放的?
- 希洽- 小智終究是個時代的敗北者 很慘? 小智終究是個時代的敗北者 很慘?
- 詐騙爆料:揭秘黑平台RUNWIN,被RUNWIN詐騙怎麼辦?RUNWIN是詐騙平台,RUNWIN是詐騙黑平台,揭秘RUNWIN詐騙手法
- 男女- 一直放不下 想復合卻找不到方法 一直放不下 想復合卻找不到方法
- Glee- Lea Michele 結婚啦!
- 希洽- 橋牌的程式? 橋牌的程式?
- 詐騙通報:泰富是真的嗎、泰富詐騙、泰富是詐騙嗎、博泓證券是詐騙嗎、泰富投資詐騙、博泓詐騙、博泓證券詐騙。
- BaseballXXXX- 邦迷心中完美陣容 邦迷心中完美陣容
- ★假冒三帛投資顧問股份有限公司詐騙、三帛投顧詐騙、三帛詐騙、三帛APP詐騙、(顧問)余雅雯詐騙、無法出金
- WebRadio- shotcast 沒有聲音
- BLUE- 關於4everBlue專輯
- 股票- 廣達請益 廣達請益
- 詐騙通報:LSE詐騙、LSE是詐騙嗎、LSE是真的嗎、LSE投資詐騙、LSE投資是詐騙嗎、LSE投資平台詐騙、 LSE交易所詐騙。
- 行動通訊- Note 20 Ultra螢幕截圖問題 Note 20 Ultra螢幕截圖問題
- GateMX
- 棒球- 郭泰源的高速滑球在台灣失傳了嗎? 郭泰源的高速滑球在台灣失傳了嗎?
- BaseballXXXX- 陳品捷 陳品捷
- 棒球- 爪爪是不是帶太多外野手在一軍 爪爪是不是帶太多外野手在一軍
- BaseballXXXX- 五連勝的先發投手滾回中繼 五連勝的先發投手滾回中繼
- 蘋果iOS作業系統- 修理還是買上一代的手機好 修理還是買上一代的手機好
- 棒球- 富邦去打系際盃能奪冠嗎 富邦去打系際盃能奪冠嗎
- 詐騙爆料:揭秘黑平台Eamom,被Eamom詐騙怎麼辦?Eamom是詐騙平台,Eamom是詐騙黑平台,揭秘Eamom詐騙手法
- 棒球- 韓國還沒被淘汰…… 韓國還沒被淘汰……
- BaseballXXXX- 2-6 2-6
- 英雄聯盟- 競技場卡特蓮娜有解嗎? 競技場卡特蓮娜有解嗎?
- 電影- 哈利波特系列是不是就缺乏了洗腦歌 哈利波特系列是不是就缺乏了洗腦歌
- 請問線上購物 一些網站要加入會員 填寫個人資料 會有甚麼疑慮?
- 網球- 拉卡度姆為何比之前新星都還紅 拉卡度姆為何比之前新星都還紅
- 馮德萊恩:對付咄咄逼人的美國,應該這樣做
- 棒球- 經典賽只能排短槍打線了嗎? 經典賽只能排短槍打線了嗎?