已解答這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
7個答案 這題英文解析是甚麼呢?()you at home,you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?
-
匿名 #1樓
( )you at home, you could open the door for me.But since you are at work,I don't want to bother you. A.Were B.If C.Would D.Should?若抄文句沒錯/漏的話,( ) you at home中沒有動詞,從文意(意思)來看,若填入A. Were you at home是一條問題句,因此句子應該是Were you at home? 但現在句是前後兩截的,看來應該是一組條件conditional句。B. If you at home, you could open the door for me.但這樣的子句'If you at home'是口語的片語,若是原整的文法應該是If you are at home, you could open the door for me.才是正確的'假設性'條件句子。C. Would you at home, ...這問句前段結構跟後段不成立。意思上Would是問'可否?'D. Should you at home,...。意思上Should是問'應否?'或這寫法亦可以是假設性'若然你....',但我認為文法上仍欠'動詞'。句式上唯有寫/說Should you be at home, you could open the door for me.才是正確的英文句法說出一樣沒有發生過的假設情景回想。因此四個答案都沒有'正確';若然必要在錯選擇中選一個較為'合情理和文理'而意思上較接近這段說話的情況:「我不知你是否在家,假如現在你在家,我希望你能給我開門;但現在我知道了你在公司(工作中),我便不打擾你了。」,我唯有選B. 只是因為較為'直接'的假設用詞(不理會文法錯誤)說出我假設性的原想法,只表示意會這段說話的前後含意。若然翻查原文,看看是否抄漏了些字:( ) you're at home, ...
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #2樓
The conditional adj is depending on a certain conditioneg:-His agreement to open the door is due to the fact that if he is at home, and not at work.Hence (A) Were you at home.The other variety from which to choose=choice are not conditional.
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #3樓
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #4樓
A:if
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #5樓
If you at home, you could open the doors for me. But since you are at work and I don't want to bother you.
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #6樓
A 是對的.Were you at home... = If you were at home ...是<與事實相反的假設語氣>
回答日期:2021-04-19 -
匿名 #7樓
本句為標準假設句且與現在事實相反,為何不能用if 因為欠缺動詞,所以本句還原為?if you were at home,you could open the door for me.另可改成動詞提前。were you at home,you could open the door for me.亦可
回答日期:2021-04-19
其他問題
- SOPHIE CAPITAL是詐騙嗎?確定是詐騙,假平台。真詐騙!
- 健身- 追求不靠慣性吊掛移動,如何有效率練? 追求不靠慣性吊掛移動,如何有效率練?
- 希洽- 不喜歡打王血很厚的機制 不喜歡打王血很厚的機制
- 棒球- Livan Hernandez是如何在MLB生存的 Livan Hernandez是如何在MLB生存的
- IC Markets是詐騙嗎?丨IC Markets詐騙丨假投資真詐騙丨提領不出金
- 棒球- 朱祥麟是不是很適合現在的火腿隊 朱祥麟是不是很適合現在的火腿隊
- 希洽- 該如何攻略好感一高就會突然冷淡的女角 該如何攻略好感一高就會突然冷淡的女角
- 揚帆啟航互利共贏詐騙、伯倫byron詐騙、遠雄徵工詐騙 『通報』
- 蘋果iOS作業系統- apple watch不能解鎖app的face id? apple watch不能解鎖app的face id?
- BaseballXXXX- cc001225 cc001225
- BaseballXXXX- 安樂死合法化 安樂死合法化
- 歐美影集- BCS:Howard不該是這種下場......... BCS:Howard不該是這種下場.........
- BaseballXXXX- 爪迷 爪迷
- 通報:LSE交易所是詐騙嗎丨被LSE交易所詐騙了怎麼辦丨LSE交易所詐騙丨LSE投資詐騙丨虛擬貨幣詐騙
- BaseballXXXX- 是不是大師兄打全壘打 是不是大師兄打全壘打
- 棒球- 為啥富邦球員都不會觸擊? 為啥富邦球員都不會觸擊?
- 日本麻將 - 日麻- 如何提高做牌速度?
- 房屋交易- 室內坪數的計算?? 室內坪數的計算??
- BaseballXXXX- 雙紅會的番外篇 姐妹內戰 雙紅會的番外篇 姐妹內戰
- 女人話題- 一直勸人結婚生子是不是很白目? 一直勸人結婚生子是不是很白目?
- Garena - 台灣競舞娛樂- 請益Garena貝殼幣
- ICRT- 徵求 8/13 1930-2000的錄音檔
- 希洽- [Holo
- 希洽- 中野五月去薩利亞會點多少? 中野五月去薩利亞會點多少?
- 銓鼎科技真的嗎?(冒)銓鼎科技詐騙、(冒)銓鼎科技投資詐騙、(冒)銓鼎科技理財詐騙
- 爆料詐騙平台:HKCEXP是詐騙嗎、HKCEXP安全嗎?被HKCEXP交易所詐騙怎麼辦?HKCEXP詐騙、HKCEXP交易所詐騙、投資詐騙、黑網詐騙平台,受害人被騙143萬無法出金
- 行動通訊- 給親人用GPS功能型手機
- 希洽- 跳舞機是不是不太能減肥 跳舞機是不是不太能減肥
- 棒球- 林岳平有過大扣分的調度(或決策)嗎? 林岳平有過大扣分的調度(或決策)嗎?
- 男女- 戀愛就是一個麻煩的東西 戀愛就是一個麻煩的東西